The Importance of Community Association Committees
By Augustus H. Shaw IV, Esq, CCAL
Association Committees serve a vital function in community associations. They provide an opportunity for Association members to serve their community in specialized areas. Committees also serve to aid the Board of Directors in governing the Association.
Association Committees are functions of the Association’s Board of Directors. Committees can come in the form of an Architectural Control Committee, Landscaping Committee, Welcome Wagon Committee, etc. In most Associations, committee members serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors; meaning that the Board of Directors has the power to appoint or remove committee members with or without cause.
While Association Committees may have a vital role, there role (with the exception of the architectural/design review committee) is advisory; meaning that the committee makes suggestions to the Association’s Board of Directors. Committees rarely have the authority to bind the Association without prior board approval.
Most Association Committees meet on a regular basis. If an Association Committee meets on a regular basis, the Committee must meet in the State of Arizona (A.R.S. §33-1804(B) (Planned Communities) and A.R.S. §33-1248(B) (Condominiums)). Also, association members or their designated representatives have the right to attend and speak at Committee meetings (A.R.S. §33-1804(A) (Planned Communities) and A.R.S. §33-1248(A) (Condominiums)).
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Shaw & Lines Team wins "Small Firm" Division in The Night Run’s Law Team Challenge!
A team from Shaw & Lines, LLC recently participated in The Night Run Challenge, an 8K race through Downtown Scottsdale benefiting the Workshop for Youth and Families. Participant in the Night Run Challenge included local law firms. The Shaw & Lines Team won the "Small Firm" Division! Congratulations to all who participated!!
The cool shirts were designed and manufactured by Pinnacle Prints & Embroidery, who graciously sponsored the team. Their website is www.pinnacleprintsinc.com. Shaw & Lines, LLC sincerely thanks Pinnacle Prints & Embroidery for their sponsorship of the shirts.
Friday, May 11, 2012
Many of the questions submitted to me regard how a HOA may enforce the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs). As such, I have decided to briefly explain how HOAs may enforce their CC&Rs. Enforcement of a HOA’s CC&Rs may be effectuate in two types of actions, which are the imposition of fines and the filing of a lawsuit seeking Injunctive relief.
Imposing a fine for the violation of a HOA’s CC&Rs is the most common means of gaining compliance in HOAs in Arizona. Under A.R.S. §33-1803, which applies to Planned Communities (the Condominium Act, the Arizona Statute that applies to condominiums, does not contain a provision on the imposition of fines. As such, one must look to the CC&Rs of the condominium to determine whether the imposition of a fine may be effectuated), a HOA may fine an owner who is in violation of the restrictions so long as the following criteria are met:
1. The fine is “reasonable”;
2. The fine is imposed after notice and an opportunity to be heard; and
3. The notice of the fine must contain a statement regarding how the fine will be enforced.
The amount of fines must be reasonable. This means that the fine amount set must be reasonable in regard to the violation. For example, a $1000 fine for weeds in the front yard would likely be considered unreasonable.
Additionally, many HOAs mistakenly impose fines for violations of the restrictions without providing the violating owner an opportunity to be heard before the HOA’s board of directors. This problem may be corrected by informing the owner, in the fine notification, that if the owner wishes to discuss the fine with the HOA’s board of directors, he may do so. Please note that an opportunity to be heard must only be provided. If an owner does not take the opportunity to be heard, the fine may be imposed.
Finally, an owner must be informed as to how a HOA intends to collect the fine if the owner refuses to pay the fine. Recent changes to the laws affecting homeowners associations have removed imposed fines from the association’s assessment lien unless an association’s documents otherwise provide. This means that fines may no longer be automatically included in a notice of claim of lien or in a pay-off statement developed when an owner sells or conveys his property unless the association obtains a valid judgment and records said judgment. Also, lots may no longer be foreclosed due to delinquent fines.
Arizona has long established that enforcement of restrictive covenants may be effectuated through the seeking of an injunction, which is a civil lawsuit asking a judge to order a noncompliant homeowner to comply with the restrictive covenants.
An injunction should be used when fining is either inappropriate or ineffective, meaning, an injunction should be used in situations where either immediate compliance is required (situations involving health and safety) or situations where fining becomes ineffective (i.e. the owner is ignoring the fines).
Many CC&Rs allow HOAs to recover the legal fees used to obtain the injunction if the Association prevails in the suit. The fees would be recouped through requesting that the court award attorney’s fees to the prevailing party.
Imposing a fine for the violation of a HOA’s CC&Rs is the most common means of gaining compliance in HOAs in Arizona. Under A.R.S. §33-1803, which applies to Planned Communities (the Condominium Act, the Arizona Statute that applies to condominiums, does not contain a provision on the imposition of fines. As such, one must look to the CC&Rs of the condominium to determine whether the imposition of a fine may be effectuated), a HOA may fine an owner who is in violation of the restrictions so long as the following criteria are met:
1. The fine is “reasonable”;
2. The fine is imposed after notice and an opportunity to be heard; and
3. The notice of the fine must contain a statement regarding how the fine will be enforced.
The amount of fines must be reasonable. This means that the fine amount set must be reasonable in regard to the violation. For example, a $1000 fine for weeds in the front yard would likely be considered unreasonable.
Additionally, many HOAs mistakenly impose fines for violations of the restrictions without providing the violating owner an opportunity to be heard before the HOA’s board of directors. This problem may be corrected by informing the owner, in the fine notification, that if the owner wishes to discuss the fine with the HOA’s board of directors, he may do so. Please note that an opportunity to be heard must only be provided. If an owner does not take the opportunity to be heard, the fine may be imposed.
Finally, an owner must be informed as to how a HOA intends to collect the fine if the owner refuses to pay the fine. Recent changes to the laws affecting homeowners associations have removed imposed fines from the association’s assessment lien unless an association’s documents otherwise provide. This means that fines may no longer be automatically included in a notice of claim of lien or in a pay-off statement developed when an owner sells or conveys his property unless the association obtains a valid judgment and records said judgment. Also, lots may no longer be foreclosed due to delinquent fines.
Arizona has long established that enforcement of restrictive covenants may be effectuated through the seeking of an injunction, which is a civil lawsuit asking a judge to order a noncompliant homeowner to comply with the restrictive covenants.
An injunction should be used when fining is either inappropriate or ineffective, meaning, an injunction should be used in situations where either immediate compliance is required (situations involving health and safety) or situations where fining becomes ineffective (i.e. the owner is ignoring the fines).
Many CC&Rs allow HOAs to recover the legal fees used to obtain the injunction if the Association prevails in the suit. The fees would be recouped through requesting that the court award attorney’s fees to the prevailing party.
Friday, May 4, 2012
Seven Secrets of a Successful Community Association
By Augustus H. Shaw IV, Esq., CCAL
Shaw & Lines, LLC
Many of my Association clients ask me what are the secrets to some of your more successful association clients. I respond to them that over the years, I have seen seven traits that successful community association implement on a daily basis. The seven traits of a successful community association are:
1. Have an Educated Board of Directors;
2. Hire Professional Management;
3. Listen to the Membership;
4. Seek Member Involvement;
5. Treat All Members Equally;
6. Inspect the Common Property; and
7. Obtain Proper Community Association Insurance.
These traits, when implemented, will help a community association not only properly serve the members, but also steer clear of potential pitfalls and liability.
The Prescott and Sedona HOA Academy – May 19, 2012
The Prescott and Sedona HOA Academy is your chance to take a crash course in how to operate, manage and live in a homeowners asso¬ciation. This FREE Seminar and Lunch is presented by the Leadership Centre, a non-profit 501(c)(3) that provides Arizona residents with information, resources and tools that create and support effective community leaders. Classes to be taught at the Academy include: 1. Legal Aspects of Community Associations; 2. Changes in the Laws Affecting Community Associations; 3. Association Meetings; 4. How to Choose a Vendor/Management Company; and 5. Association Budgets. For more information, please see www.theleadershipcentre.org or www.shawlines.com
The Prescott and Sedona HOA Academy will take place Saturday, May 19, 2012 (9:30am Registration - 9:50am start time to 4:00pm) at the City of Prescott Adult Center 1280 E. Rosser Street, Prescott, AZ 86301. To Register phone 480.456.1500 or e-mail info@shawlines.com.
By Augustus H. Shaw IV, Esq., CCAL
Shaw & Lines, LLC
Many of my Association clients ask me what are the secrets to some of your more successful association clients. I respond to them that over the years, I have seen seven traits that successful community association implement on a daily basis. The seven traits of a successful community association are:
1. Have an Educated Board of Directors;
2. Hire Professional Management;
3. Listen to the Membership;
4. Seek Member Involvement;
5. Treat All Members Equally;
6. Inspect the Common Property; and
7. Obtain Proper Community Association Insurance.
These traits, when implemented, will help a community association not only properly serve the members, but also steer clear of potential pitfalls and liability.
The Prescott and Sedona HOA Academy – May 19, 2012
The Prescott and Sedona HOA Academy is your chance to take a crash course in how to operate, manage and live in a homeowners asso¬ciation. This FREE Seminar and Lunch is presented by the Leadership Centre, a non-profit 501(c)(3) that provides Arizona residents with information, resources and tools that create and support effective community leaders. Classes to be taught at the Academy include: 1. Legal Aspects of Community Associations; 2. Changes in the Laws Affecting Community Associations; 3. Association Meetings; 4. How to Choose a Vendor/Management Company; and 5. Association Budgets. For more information, please see www.theleadershipcentre.org or www.shawlines.com
The Prescott and Sedona HOA Academy will take place Saturday, May 19, 2012 (9:30am Registration - 9:50am start time to 4:00pm) at the City of Prescott Adult Center 1280 E. Rosser Street, Prescott, AZ 86301. To Register phone 480.456.1500 or e-mail info@shawlines.com.
Friday, April 27, 2012
ANNUAL MEETINGS OF THE MEMBERS
by Augustus H. Shaw IV, Esq., CCAL
Probably the most important meeting a homeowners association is required to conduct is the Annual Meeting of the Members. Not only do most Governing Documents require associations to conduct Annual Meetings, Arizona law requires associations to conduct an Annual Meeting at least once per year.
Annual Meetings are meetings of the Members. They are held to conduct the “business” of the Membership and allow the Membership to address their association. In most associations, Annual Meetings are conducted for three main purposes: 1. To Conduct Member “Business”; 2. To Elect Members to the Association’s Board of Directors; and 3. To Allow the Members to Address their Association.
By far the most important purpose of an Annual Meeting is to elect Members to the association’s Board of Directors. Effectuating an election to the Board of Directors takes a great deal of forethought, especially in light of Arizona Law.
It is very important to remember that the Annual Meeting is a meeting of the Members; meaning that the Members should be provided with an opportunity to address their Board of Directors and other Members of the Association. Many associations attempt to limit who may speak at an Annual Meeting. A good policy to have is to let all Members who wish to speak have the opportunity to speak but limit how long they may speak. I usually suggest no more that 5 minutes per person but this timeframe may be less depending on the number of Members who desire to speak. I further suggest that, where a meeting becomes very adversarial, the Association strictly comply with all time limits, even bringing a stop watch or other timer if necessary.
by Augustus H. Shaw IV, Esq., CCAL
Probably the most important meeting a homeowners association is required to conduct is the Annual Meeting of the Members. Not only do most Governing Documents require associations to conduct Annual Meetings, Arizona law requires associations to conduct an Annual Meeting at least once per year.
Annual Meetings are meetings of the Members. They are held to conduct the “business” of the Membership and allow the Membership to address their association. In most associations, Annual Meetings are conducted for three main purposes: 1. To Conduct Member “Business”; 2. To Elect Members to the Association’s Board of Directors; and 3. To Allow the Members to Address their Association.
By far the most important purpose of an Annual Meeting is to elect Members to the association’s Board of Directors. Effectuating an election to the Board of Directors takes a great deal of forethought, especially in light of Arizona Law.
It is very important to remember that the Annual Meeting is a meeting of the Members; meaning that the Members should be provided with an opportunity to address their Board of Directors and other Members of the Association. Many associations attempt to limit who may speak at an Annual Meeting. A good policy to have is to let all Members who wish to speak have the opportunity to speak but limit how long they may speak. I usually suggest no more that 5 minutes per person but this timeframe may be less depending on the number of Members who desire to speak. I further suggest that, where a meeting becomes very adversarial, the Association strictly comply with all time limits, even bringing a stop watch or other timer if necessary.
Friday, April 20, 2012
Association Record Keeping in the Digital Age
By Augustus H. Shaw IV, Esq., CCAL
As Arizona community associations become older, an interesting issue arises; what does a community association do with the boxes and boxes of association records it accumulates over the years?
In today’s litigious community association climate, it is difficult to advise that community associations destroy older records. Moreover, the storage of large quantities of community association records could begin to take a financial toll on community associations and the companies that manage them.
Because of the records storage dilemma, many community associations and management companies are moving toward or desire to investigate the implementation of a paperless or electronic record keeping system. This article will discuss what laws apply to paperless or electronic record keeping and issues community associations and management companies should consider when investigating moving toward a paperless or electronic record keeping system.
Paperless or electronic record keeping requires original paper records be “digitized” for electronic storage. Once “digitized,” the records may then be stored on a server, stored on a DVD, stored on thumb drive or stored on a normal computer.
While in today’s digital age it is an easy proposition to store records electronically, the key question is does the law allow community association records to be stored electronically?
While in today’s digital age it is an easy proposition to store records electronically, the key question is does the law allow community association records to be stored electronically?
For those community associations that are non-profit corporations (the vast majority of community associations are non-profit corporations), the Arizona Non-Profit Corporations Act will shed some light on a community association’s ability to store records electronically. Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) §10-11601(D), a provision of the Arizona Non Profit Corporations Act states "[A] corporation shall maintain its records in written form or in another form capable of conversion into written form within a reasonable time."
Therefore, pursuant to A.R.S. §10-11601(D), so long as a community association can take records stored electronically and convert them back to paper form “within a reasonable time,” a community association may store records electronically.
Two final important points. First, the requirement of A.R.S. §10-11601(D) to convert electronic records back to paper form “within a reasonable time” may be easily determined. The Planned Communities Act (at A.R.S. §33-1805) and the Condominium Act (at A.R.S. §33-1258) provides community associations with a ten (10) business day timeframe to have records available for an owner’s review. So long as electronic records may be converted back to paper form in time to abide by the above statutes, the Association will meet the provisions of A.R.S. §10-11601(D).
Second, it is extremely important to have a full-proof electronic storage system for the electronic records. It is advisable to have several backups for the medium in which you will be saving the electronic records. Remember, if a community association cannot convert the electronic records back to paper form within a reasonable time due to a file storage error, the Association may be in violation of A.R.S. §10-11601(D) and possibly A.R.S. §33-1805 (Planned Communities) and A.R.S. §33-1258 (Condominiums).
An electronic record keeping system could save a community association and its manager time and money and storage space. So long as the proper precautions are observed and respected, I see electronic record keeping as the wave of the future.
This article was printed in the Winter 2011 edition of Community Resource Magazine. Community Resource Magazine is published by the Central Arizona Chapter of the Community Association Institute.
This article was printed in the Winter 2011 edition of Community Resource Magazine. Community Resource Magazine is published by the Central Arizona Chapter of the Community Association Institute.
Thursday, April 19, 2012
I am the Association! How to Handle the Overbearing Board Member
Every Community Association (or almost) has a Overbearing Board Member, a Member who refuses to keep confidential information, interrupts meetings or represents the Association without full Board approval. Overbearing Board Members can cause a host of legal issues for an association, the Board and the Overbearing Member. This document will discuss the legal liability facing community associations regarding Overbearing Board Members and how community associations should address the situation and protect itself.
As a starting point, it is important to understand that not all Overbearing Board Members have a nefarious intent. Most Overbearing Board Members have a sincere desire to better the community association. Sometimes Overbearing Board Members feel that their actions are in response to a perceived lack of action by the full Board of Directors. Most Overbearing Board Members want to make their communities better but are simply not educated regarding the proper way to accomplish their goals.
So, while this document is meant to instruct community associations on how to identify and address an Overbearing Board Member; this document may also serve as a reflection tool to Board Members so that they may ensure that they do not become an Overbearing Board Member.
An Overbearing Board Member is a member of a community association Board of Directors who displays the following types of behavior:
1. Conducts himself or herself uncivilly at meetings of the Board of Directors;
2. Seeks to enforce the restrictive covenants on his or her own;
3. Fails to keep confidential information;
4. Talks badly about other Board Members; and
5. Fails to thoughtfully consider the advice of experts (i.e. the association’s manager, attorney or other professionals);
Overbearing Board Members can cause a number of practical problems for the Board and the community association. Overbearing Board Members can interrupt the flow of Board meetings and make them more difficult to conduct. Additionally, Rouge Board Members can discourage other Members of the Association’s Board from fully participating in Board Meetings.
While there are a number of practical reasons why Overbearing Board Members are not good for community associations, there are more important legal reasons why Overbearing Board Members should be addressed.
Overbearing Board Members may be difficult to deal with, but they also create a wide range of legal issues for a community association. In order to fully discuss the different types of potential liability, it is important to revisit the actual behaviors.
When an Overbearing Board Member conducts himself or herself uncivilly at Board meetings, said behavior could disrupt the Board meeting and may lead to important issues not being fully discussed. In addition, other Board members may feel deeply offended or intimidated by the Overbearing Board Member’s conduct.
The above could lead to legal liability in the form of a harassment lawsuit against the Overbearing Board Members and a lawsuit against the community association for failing to address the Overbearing Board Member’s conduct.
When an Overbearing Board Members seeks to enforce the restrictive covenants on their own, this activity could lead to breach of the community association’s policies on enforcement. When an Overbearing Board Member takes enforcement action outside of the association’s normal enforcement policies and procedures, this could subject the association to legal liability based on unequal enforcement and breach of the association’s own policies and procedures.
Every community association board discusses information that, for a number of reasons, should be kept confidential. It is important for Board members to keep confidential information confidential. Overbearing Board Members fail to keep confidential information confidential which could lead to legal liability based on harassment, liable, slander and misrepresentation. Divulging confidential information could also lead to a breach of the attorney client privilege and negatively affect legal action involving the community association.
Speaking badly about a fellow Board member can lead to ill feelings and resentment that can affect the efficient operation of the Board. Moreover, it could lead to liable and slander liability if the statements made by the Overbearing Board Member are false or misleading.
Under Arizona Law, a Board member will be held to not breach their fiduciary duty if they thoughtfully consider the advice of experts. Overbearing Board Members tend to believe that they are the expert in everything and hiring an expert is not needed. This type of behavior could lead to a host of liabilities depending on the area of expertise not sought.
Addressing the behavior of an Overbearing Board Member is a delicate matter. This is because, as stated above, the Overbearing Board Member may not feel that their actions are harmful to the association. Moreover, the Overbearing Board Member may feel that they have no other choice but to engage in this type of behavior.
Prior to addressing an Overbearing Board Member, it is important that the manager and other Board Members agree that the behavior of the Overbearing Board Member is problematic. Also, the association may want to obtain legal advice regarding whether the activities of the Overbearing Board Member present an imminent danger to the association.
When addressing an Overbearing Board Member, there are two main processes. There is the informal process and the formal process.
The first step of the informal process concerning the addressing of an Overbearing Board would be to, in an executive session meeting of the Board of Directors, present the Overbearing Board Member with a written list of the behaviors the Overbearing Board Member is engaging in. This should be followed up with a discussion on how the behavior could harm the association and ways to positively address the behavior.
If the Overbearing Board Member continues to engage in damaging behavior, the next step would be to discuss the Overbearing Board Member’s actions in an open meeting of the Board of Directors. A document should be drafted detailing the areas of concern and ways the Overbearing Board Member can address the behavior.
If the Overbearing Board Members continues his/her behavior after the informal process, then the next step would be to conduct the Formal Process. The Formal Process begins with an official letter of censure to the Overbearing Board Member. The Censure Letter should list out the areas of concern and should also list the ramifications if the Overbearing Board Member continues their behavior.
If the Overbearing Board Member continues their activities after a formal Censure Letter has been issued, the association has two remaining options, said options being:
a. The calling of a special meeting of the association to discuss the removal of the Overbearing Board Member from the Board of Directors; or
b. Filing a breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit.
Most community association bylaws allow either the President of the association or a majority of the Board of Directors to call a special meeting of the members. This special meeting of the members could be held to discuss the removal of a member from the association’s Board of directors.
Calling a removal meeting should be only done in extreme circumstances. It is always advisable that prior to calling the removal meeting, the association seek the advice of its attorney.
This is absolutely the last option an association may take regarding an Overbearing Board Member and the most drastic. Before considering this option, the association should consult with its attorney to determine whether this option may be effectuated.
Addressing the issue of an Overbearing Board Member is not easy. Community associations, however, must be able to identify the warning signs and address the issue quickly before the issue leads to legal liability.
As a starting point, it is important to understand that not all Overbearing Board Members have a nefarious intent. Most Overbearing Board Members have a sincere desire to better the community association. Sometimes Overbearing Board Members feel that their actions are in response to a perceived lack of action by the full Board of Directors. Most Overbearing Board Members want to make their communities better but are simply not educated regarding the proper way to accomplish their goals.
So, while this document is meant to instruct community associations on how to identify and address an Overbearing Board Member; this document may also serve as a reflection tool to Board Members so that they may ensure that they do not become an Overbearing Board Member.
An Overbearing Board Member is a member of a community association Board of Directors who displays the following types of behavior:
1. Conducts himself or herself uncivilly at meetings of the Board of Directors;
2. Seeks to enforce the restrictive covenants on his or her own;
3. Fails to keep confidential information;
4. Talks badly about other Board Members; and
5. Fails to thoughtfully consider the advice of experts (i.e. the association’s manager, attorney or other professionals);
Overbearing Board Members can cause a number of practical problems for the Board and the community association. Overbearing Board Members can interrupt the flow of Board meetings and make them more difficult to conduct. Additionally, Rouge Board Members can discourage other Members of the Association’s Board from fully participating in Board Meetings.
While there are a number of practical reasons why Overbearing Board Members are not good for community associations, there are more important legal reasons why Overbearing Board Members should be addressed.
Overbearing Board Members may be difficult to deal with, but they also create a wide range of legal issues for a community association. In order to fully discuss the different types of potential liability, it is important to revisit the actual behaviors.
When an Overbearing Board Member conducts himself or herself uncivilly at Board meetings, said behavior could disrupt the Board meeting and may lead to important issues not being fully discussed. In addition, other Board members may feel deeply offended or intimidated by the Overbearing Board Member’s conduct.
The above could lead to legal liability in the form of a harassment lawsuit against the Overbearing Board Members and a lawsuit against the community association for failing to address the Overbearing Board Member’s conduct.
When an Overbearing Board Members seeks to enforce the restrictive covenants on their own, this activity could lead to breach of the community association’s policies on enforcement. When an Overbearing Board Member takes enforcement action outside of the association’s normal enforcement policies and procedures, this could subject the association to legal liability based on unequal enforcement and breach of the association’s own policies and procedures.
Every community association board discusses information that, for a number of reasons, should be kept confidential. It is important for Board members to keep confidential information confidential. Overbearing Board Members fail to keep confidential information confidential which could lead to legal liability based on harassment, liable, slander and misrepresentation. Divulging confidential information could also lead to a breach of the attorney client privilege and negatively affect legal action involving the community association.
Speaking badly about a fellow Board member can lead to ill feelings and resentment that can affect the efficient operation of the Board. Moreover, it could lead to liable and slander liability if the statements made by the Overbearing Board Member are false or misleading.
Under Arizona Law, a Board member will be held to not breach their fiduciary duty if they thoughtfully consider the advice of experts. Overbearing Board Members tend to believe that they are the expert in everything and hiring an expert is not needed. This type of behavior could lead to a host of liabilities depending on the area of expertise not sought.
Addressing the behavior of an Overbearing Board Member is a delicate matter. This is because, as stated above, the Overbearing Board Member may not feel that their actions are harmful to the association. Moreover, the Overbearing Board Member may feel that they have no other choice but to engage in this type of behavior.
Prior to addressing an Overbearing Board Member, it is important that the manager and other Board Members agree that the behavior of the Overbearing Board Member is problematic. Also, the association may want to obtain legal advice regarding whether the activities of the Overbearing Board Member present an imminent danger to the association.
When addressing an Overbearing Board Member, there are two main processes. There is the informal process and the formal process.
The first step of the informal process concerning the addressing of an Overbearing Board would be to, in an executive session meeting of the Board of Directors, present the Overbearing Board Member with a written list of the behaviors the Overbearing Board Member is engaging in. This should be followed up with a discussion on how the behavior could harm the association and ways to positively address the behavior.
If the Overbearing Board Member continues to engage in damaging behavior, the next step would be to discuss the Overbearing Board Member’s actions in an open meeting of the Board of Directors. A document should be drafted detailing the areas of concern and ways the Overbearing Board Member can address the behavior.
If the Overbearing Board Members continues his/her behavior after the informal process, then the next step would be to conduct the Formal Process. The Formal Process begins with an official letter of censure to the Overbearing Board Member. The Censure Letter should list out the areas of concern and should also list the ramifications if the Overbearing Board Member continues their behavior.
If the Overbearing Board Member continues their activities after a formal Censure Letter has been issued, the association has two remaining options, said options being:
a. The calling of a special meeting of the association to discuss the removal of the Overbearing Board Member from the Board of Directors; or
b. Filing a breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit.
Most community association bylaws allow either the President of the association or a majority of the Board of Directors to call a special meeting of the members. This special meeting of the members could be held to discuss the removal of a member from the association’s Board of directors.
Calling a removal meeting should be only done in extreme circumstances. It is always advisable that prior to calling the removal meeting, the association seek the advice of its attorney.
This is absolutely the last option an association may take regarding an Overbearing Board Member and the most drastic. Before considering this option, the association should consult with its attorney to determine whether this option may be effectuated.
Addressing the issue of an Overbearing Board Member is not easy. Community associations, however, must be able to identify the warning signs and address the issue quickly before the issue leads to legal liability.
Monday, April 5, 2010
Spirited Rivalry and Deep Roots in Arizona
Authored by Mark LinesThe classes were filled with community managers who live in and work with communities in Tucson. It wasn't long into my portion of the presentation before the automatic, routine references to "Maricopa County" fell freely from my lips when discussing legal procedures in the court systems and various governmental agencies (such as the recorder, assessor and sheriff's offices). Faster than my out-of-place references were heard, I was quickly reminded that I was in Tucson and "not in the State of Maricopa anymore." (At least I knew they were listening to what I was saying.)
Although our firm represents community associations throughout the state, and we frequently appear in courts in several different counties, the core base of our firm's clients are in the Phoenix metropolitan area - and Maricopa County. After all, we are community association lawyers. Over 65% of our state's population live in Maricopa County (at least as of our last, and now 10-year-old census report). After holding steady during the 1960s and 1970s, the population density in the Phoenix urbanized areas began to skyrocket in the 1980s through the present time. And ... it wasn't long before my latent bias for my home town marked me as the "outsider" to my Tucson friends and colleagues.
I think it was just after my first apology for slipping into "Maricopa County" mode that I was called out ... "you are probably a Sun Devil fan too, huh?" A moment of truth, and a dilemma: Do I revert to some diplomatic response about being a fan of all "Arizona" sports? Should I talk about the success of UofA's Wildcats basketball program and even name a few of the Wildcat turned NBA professionals?
The truth was then revealed: "Yes, I went to ASU for both undergrad and law school. But my business partner, Augustus Shaw, went to UofA for both undergrad and law school." I think some of the reassuring head-nodding was more politeness than acceptance; but it deflected a bit from my status as "visitor."
But, even back in my home base office in Phoenix, spirited debates are always ongoing. They tend to surface before the rivals meet for the "The Duel in the Desert" at the end of each football season (more recent historical advantage: ASU). They then picks up even more during basketball season (advantage: UofA - no debate). In fact, if there is any sport in season, a debate may spark. Beyond sports, the banter continues about where these respective universities' law schools fall in the national rankings published each year (advantage: UofA -- by just a little bit).
As partners in the firm, we are split between our loyalties for our alma maters (or almea matres for the hyper-technicals out there). When the firm put together a city league basketball team a few years ago, and with the intervention and help of a great graphic designer (J.D. Winters - Jadeyproductions.com), the debate of the team name and logo was easily settled:
UofA does deserve credit as Arizona's first University officially founded in 1885. Technically, ASU was also founded this same year, only under the name "Tempe Normal School for the Arizona Territory" (although the plaque on ASU's "Old Main" building says 1884).
Regardless of our loyalties, the partners in the firm are proud that we both represent clients as "Arizona lawyers." Not only did we both attend and graduate from Arizona universities and law schools, Mr. Shaw and I are both natives of Arizona. Mr. Shaw was born and raised in Tempe, Arizona. I was born and raised in Mesa, Arizona. Each of us left our home state for a time living overseas. Mr. Shaw served in the U.S. Navy during the Gulf War. I lived in the Philippines for two years during that same time period. When we returned to pursue academics, we chose Arizona.
Arizona is not just home for us - it has been home for our families for several generations. Whether driving through Phoenix, or surfing the web, you may have seen the Augustus H. Shaw Junior School, which is in the Phoenix Elementary School District. This school is named after Mr. Shaw's grandfather, who was Arizona's first African American Superintendent of Schools. Mr. Shaw continues in the footsteps of his grandfather's public service.
Like Mr. Shaw, my family has also been in Arizona for generations. I am a 4th generation Arizona native through my "Lines" family. My great-grandfather, Milton Lines, was an Arizona lawmaker and served in the Arizona House of Representatives for 16 consecutive years. His son (my grandfather), Earl Lines, was an attorney and was elected to serve as the Safford County Treasurer for two terms before he was drafted as an infantryman to fight in WWII. After returning from the war, he continued his law practice and eventually served as a Court Commissioner in Maricopa County for 9 years.
Although debates will spark in the office at times between our favorite Arizona sports teams or schools, our firm is proud to have deep roots in Arizona, including public service in various capacities. We will continue to serve Arizona clients and Arizona communities. Our spirited debates between UofA and ASU are simply natural tendencies. We relish in the rivalry, and savor the sweet upsets. But, after it is all said and done, we are both "Arizonans" and nobody is really counting a final tally.
p.s. UofA does boast the all-time record of most wins between the two schools in football with a record of 45-36-1. This record dates back to the first time these opposing teams met in 1899, before ASU was even recognized as a University. Tempe Normal (ASU) won their first match up by a score of 7 - 6. The photo at the top of this article shows the 1899 ASU football team holding the Arizona Territorial Championship trophy on the steps of "Old Main," which still stands on ASU's main campus in Tempe.From left to right, at the end of the second row, cradling his leather helmet, is Alma Davis -- who is also my great-grandfather.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Running for Troy Wendt
In early June, 2007, Troy Wendt was diagnosed with acute lymphocytic lukemia. Since then, Troy has endured a medical regimen including spinal taps every three months, monthly Vincristine chemotherapy and oral steroids, weekly Methotrexate chemotherapy and Antibiotic Bactrim medications, and a daily dose of oral Mercaptopurine chemotherapy. Along with the physical limitations caused by his treatment, Troy's diet is extremely limited and prepared with extraordinary care. His family has shown a willingness to sacrifice everything to offer the best treatment possible, and at any cost. Their determination and endurance is inspiring to all of us. (You can learn more about Troy and his treatment at http://www.troywendt.blogspot.com/.)Several of our attorneys participate in organized races and other events. When we do, we do it for Troy Wendt. We show our support by wearing shirts we've had made that displays across our backs his inspiration and our motivation: Running for Troy Wendt
Troy's family and friends have supported Troy by participating in events and fundraisers for children's charities aimed at fighting cancer. On January 30, 2010, Shaw & Lines continued its support for Troy by sponsoring several runners in London's Run, an annual benefit event at Schnepf Farms Queen Creek, Arizona. London's Run was established to support London Solomon, a beautiful and courageous six-year old girl who bravely battled acute lymphocytic leukemia. In her memory, and to support others like Troy, the annual event includes 2 mile, 10K and half-marathon runs. Several runners sported our shirts showing their support for Troy, and his inspiration. 
Among the hundreds of other participants, Shaw & Lines sponsored Mark Lines in the half-marathon race.
Mark finished with a respectable time running all 13.1
miles motivated by constant thoughts of Troy's endurance through his incomparable struggle.
Although he held a strong lead for the first 8 miles, Mark was passed and finished several minutes behind another runner also out in support of Troy ... his father, Chris Wendt.
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Firm’s Partner Inducted as a Member of CAI’s Prestigious College of Community Association Lawyers.
August H. Shaw, IV, was admitted as one of the newest members to the College of Community Association Lawyers (the College) of the national Community Associations Institute (CAI). Mr. Shaw was recognized along with just a handful of other attorneys among hundreds attending CAI’s National Law Seminar on January 30, 2009, in Palm Springs, California. Established in 1993, CAI has distinguished attorneys for their excellence in the practice of HOA law by admitting members to its prestigious College. Among literally thousands of attorneys practicing in this area across the country, fewer than 150 lawyers have been granted membership to the College. Members are admitted only by showing significant contributions to this area of law and education of boards and managers. Membership in the College reflects a recognized demonstration of high standards of professionalism, ethics and an understanding of HOA law, with a continued commitment to the betterment of the communities they serve. We congratulate Mr. Shaw for this prestigious professional accomplishment.
Firm’s Partner Recently Awarded “Instructor of the Year” by The Leadership Centre
Mark E. Lines recently received the "Instructor of the Year" Award (2008 – 2009) from The Leadership Centre (TLC). The organization recognized Mr. Lines to receive the award from among the 27 instructors for TLC. Mr. Lines is frequently invited and volunteers to teach several courses a year for TLC on the topics of “Legal Aspects of HOA’s” and its “HOA 101” course. Mayor Boyd W. Dunn, from the City of Chandler, Arizona, presented Mr. Lines with the award at TLC’s annual Neighborhoods Conference on May 16, 2009.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
